<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:access="http://www.bloglines.com/about/specs/fac-1.0">
<access:restriction relationship="allow" />
<channel>
<title>thefedpageblog</title>
<link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/</link>
<description>RecentChanges for thefedpageblog</description>

<generator>PBwiki 1.3.8</generator>
<webMaster>support@pbwiki.com</webMaster>
 <item>
  <title>Little Things that Make You Happy</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/Little+Things+that+Make+You+Happy</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (Elaine Fedderke)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>Elaine Fedderke edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/Little+Things+that+Make+You+Happy">Little Things that Make You Happy</a></h3>
When we begin rediscovering that the little things in life can make us happy, we naturally want to share this joy with others. We may gush over a friend when we run into them unexpectedly, praise a street musician for their talents, or blow bubbles for the neighborhood kids to chase. We may even start to think of the little things we can do to make other people happy, which in turn makes us happy all over again. There is an endless supply of little things and little moments that can make us happy. All we have to do is look for them, and they'll magically start to appear.<br />What do you think? Discuss this article.<br /><span style="color:red;background-color:#fcc;">Jordan Wakeham<br />I believe small things can make you happy.I felt shocked and happy at the same timewhen I was little andI got a puppy at Christmas time. I was so happy that I thought it wasn't my dog. It was scarrywhen my puppy snuggled in our laundry basket under the clothes and we could not find her. It made me very happy when we found her.I'm always happy when I get surprised by somethi</span>]]></description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>trang</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/trang</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (trangnguyen)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>trangnguyen added <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/trang">trang</a></h3>
<h1>Group Project</h1><br />
<p>&nbsp;</p><br />
<p><img class="pluginslug" contenteditable="false" src="/plugin_helper.php?plugin=toc&depth=3" isapbwikiplugin="1" /></p><br />
<p>&nbsp;</p><br />
<h2>Working together using this wiki</h2><br />
<p>&nbsp;</p><br />
<p><em>Think of this wiki as a shared online whiteboard. Your entire group can share information using this wiki, making your research accessible to everyone. Play around with this wiki: Notice how you can add comments to a page, see what people have changed, and edit all the text.</em></p><br />
<p>&nbsp;</p><br />
<h2>Group members</h2><br />
<p>&nbsp;</p><br />
<ul><br />
 <li>Jesse (<a href="aim:goim?screenname=exampleaimaddress">AIM: <img height="16" alt="" src="http://api.oscar.aol.com/SOA/key=w31On_3AGR4YyaKu/presence/exampleaimaddress" width="16" border="0" />exampleaimaddress</a>)</li><br />
 <li>Chris (<a href="mailto:chris@example.com">email me</a>)</li><br />
 <li>Dana</li><br />
 <li>Pat</li><br />
</ul><br />
<p>&nbsp;</p><br />
<p>&nbsp;</p><br />
<h2>Sources</h2><br />
<p>&nbsp;</p><br />
<ol><br />
 <li>Source 1</li><br />
 <li>Source 2</li</li></ol>]]></description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>add</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>1st period Future unit reaction</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (chaz waisner)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>chaz waisner edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction">1st period Future unit reaction</a></h3>
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/52677.html<br />Raven Dotson and Robby Schwiebert-234 Wrods<br /><span style="font-weight:bold;color:green;background-color:#cfc;">I agree that technology is starting to become very dangerous and is hurting our economy. But I also think that some of it is good and can help us maintain a healthy lifestyle in many ways. Like medicine for instance it helps us stay healthy and prevents us from getting sertain diseases in our everyday life. But television and computers are whats getting people so obease by not getting out and exercising.<br />Chaz Waisner 73 words</span><br />Reaction:<br />Technology in today's society is, for the most part, supposed to be making life easier, less riskful, and more entertaining. People who think technology is making people have limited skills when it comes to the social and communication parts of life. I think it is bettering these, maybe not other things like becoming lazy and obese from too much TV or video games. Plus, to the some who believe that future generations won't be as &quot;hands-on&quot; must be crazy ]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>6th period Future Unit</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (jessica reed)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>jessica reed edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit">6th period Future Unit</a></h3>
Work Cited<br />Kirschner, Suzanne Kantra. “The Smart House.” Good Housekeeping. November 2000. 4 October 2007 EBSCOhost &amp;lt;http://www.INFOhio.org&amp;gt;<br /><span style="font-weight:bold;color:green;background-color:#cfc;">Response to &quot;smart Houses&quot; by katie and alex.<br />I agree that smart houses can be very convenient at times and it is crazy how many things are out there today. who would think to make heated floors? crazy. as of now i can understand why not too many average americans have such things that a smart house has because it definitly costs a lot of money, but i do agree that in upcoming years these smart houses and technologies will soon takeover the states, and possibly other countries.<br />-Jessica Reed</span><br />*****Smart Houses*****<br />Andrea Ankney<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 06:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>6th period Future Unit</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (Trang Nguyen)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>Trang Nguyen edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit">6th period Future Unit</a></h3>
Work Cited<br />Bush, George W. &quot;No Child Left Behind&quot;. The White House. 06 October 2007<br /><span style="font-weight:bold;color:green;background-color:#cfc;">&amp;lt;<br />Response to &quot;Too equal?&quot; by Amanda Lewis and Dakota Lause<br />In the modern society, everyone is equal. However, it doesn’t mean that everyone has the same ability. At school, each student develops his own talent. One can be good at math; other can be good at sports. It is impossible to make all students equal, especially in the case of students with handicap. Therefore, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) will cause disadvantages in education. For the students who are not doing well at school, there will be more pressure that discourages them from trying for a better work. As for the advantageous ones, it will be awkwardness to lower their level for the sake of others. Moreover, NCLB is leading the wrong way when emphasizing most on reading and mathematics and very little on science and history. Since science and history are as important as reading and math, none of them should be n</span>]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>6th period Future Unit</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (kayla conley)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>kayla conley edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit">6th period Future Unit</a></h3>
Wilson, Daniel. &quot;Smart House- Your So-Called Sci-Fi Life.&quot; October 15 2007.<br />http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/technology_news/4216434.html<br /><span style="font-weight:bold;color:green;background-color:#cfc;">Response to &quot;Smart House&quot;<br />Technology, specifically &quot;smart houses,&quot; are not very reliable for obvious reasons. One reason is that they are too complicated. Another reason is that it makes many people's lives stressful and causes problems. Thirdly it takes away people's privacy and could possibly shut down at any moment. People need to get back to the basics of life. Too many people relay on technology these and then end up being let down. It isn't reliable enough so why don't we just relay on ourselves instead.<br />Janet Conley<br />Kayla Conley</span><br />Nuclear Weapons<br />Bryce Hussey<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>6th period Future Unit</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (kurt brown)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>kurt brown edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit">6th period Future Unit</a></h3>
Work Cited<br />Macnair, Jill and Robinson, Karen. “Houses Just Got Smarter.” The Sunday Times. 11 March 2007. 04 October 2007. Newspaper Source &amp;lt;http://web.ebscohost.com/&amp;gt;<br /><span style="font-weight:bold;color:green;background-color:#cfc;">Response to &quot;The Future Home&quot; by Kurt Brown<br />It would be nice to have a house all full of up-to-date technology, but it's just too much money to worth it. Does this mean we scrap our homes for new ones or make changes to our existing homes? We humans depend on technology to keep us alive but sometimes it does fail us. An example of this are cars: as they get more complicated, the more things that can go wrong. It appears that we should trydefinitely keep some the old and simple ways humans lived during the early generations, and blend them into the present and the future. Keeping things simple helps us build hardship and patience. Yes, it may sound odd, but it can be worth it. Technology can help usbecome more efficientaboutusing our resources and saving the environment. However, technology can't replace</span>]]></description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 00:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>1st period Future unit reaction</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (Robby Schwiebert)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>Robby Schwiebert edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction">1st period Future unit reaction</a></h3>
Caleb Lang/Nick Lamb 1st period 166 words<br />&amp;lt;http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2005/too_much_technology.html&amp;gt;<br /><span style="font-weight:bold;color:green;background-color:#cfc;">Reaction<br />I think Nick and Caleb's entry nailed how I feel about technology today and how it affects our lives. The biggest thing that I have to agree with is that the revolution of how today's modern society socializes is not a good thing. I think all of the new instant messengers and the sudden trend of texting have a very negative impact on the world we live in. These technologies are allowing people to be anyone they want to be behind the screen or cell phone and not be themselves as they would be in the real world. I know from a personal stand point that this texting can have a negative effect on teen's lives because people are more apt to say negative or offensive things and send the message to whomever without thinking twice about what they are about to say.<br />Robby Schwiebert-143</span><br />Reaction<br />I think that Sam is right about how television is a bad influenc]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>6th period Future Unit</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (Amanda Lewis)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>Amanda Lewis edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit">6th period Future Unit</a></h3>
Terrell, Kenneth. “The New Home Improvement.” U.S. News &amp; World Report.<br />6 October 2002. 4 October 2007 EBSCOhost &amp;lt;http://www.INFOhio.org&amp;gt;<br /><span style="font-weight:bold;color:green;background-color:#cfc;">Reaction to “Smart Houses”<br />A Smart House, everyone’s perfect companion, as most of society would think of it. The convenience of this is tempting, but how would our society today live without it, even if it was only in their lives for a short while? Nowadays there are cell phones, computers, and televisions in just about every home, but no one seems to think about when technology fails us. Sure enough when it does the world seems to be coming to an end very fast. Today most people can’t function without electricity to power their needs of talking with their friends constantly, or watching their favorite show. So how would it be for them when they lose the convenience of their closet picking out their clothes, or their favorite spirit lifting song playing when they walk into their home? Though seeming very insignificant at this poi</span>]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 22:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>6th period Future Unit</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (Kelsey Dockery)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>Kelsey Dockery edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit">6th period Future Unit</a></h3>
Response to “Techno Troubles”<br />Marla Erickson and Kelsey Dockery<br /> use<span style="color:red;background-color:#fcc;"> computer</span><span style="font-weight:bold;color:green;background-color:#cfc;"> computers</span> in school for all of their homework needs. Is that causing the students to become unfit? Even though some activities on these devices could result in unhealthy habits, they are only helping to increase technology and simplify our hectic, rigid, and daily routines. Without these gadgets, many people all over the world would be baffled. Whether they are for protection, extenuated knowledge, or just for a small dose of entertainment, these small objects will be of enormous assistance throughout the next century.<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 22:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>1st period Future unit reaction</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (sara Ferguson)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>sara Ferguson edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction">1st period Future unit reaction</a></h3>
Smart houses are said to be the “homes of the future”, but actually they are the homes of today. Although homes are not as advanced as the homes in some of the stories we read, they already have some “smart house” products. In august 2005, ZigBee Alliance came out with many wireless gadgets that could do some of the things we read about. One gadget was supposed to automatically set the lights to just the right mood when you are watching television or listening to music. Another was supposed to warn you if you left the stove on or your basement was flooding. “Of course this is by no means the first attempt to boost the IQ of buildings and homes,” says Chris Ryan, an analyst with the U.K. based Future Horizons. ZigBee also came out with stick-on light switches and moisture censors, which would cut the cost of installing wires or cables. Although we are far away from having houses that can do everything for us, we do have some very convenient appliances that can help us with everyday life. http://www]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 22:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>3rd period Future Unit</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/3rd+period+Future+Unit</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (ashley nagel)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>ashley nagel edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/3rd+period+Future+Unit">3rd period Future Unit</a></h3>
In raising 4 children of my own, I have had no major issues with TV at any age. They range in age from 16 to 3 and they all do very well in school and none of them has a television in their bedroom. TV can be a very good or bad learning tool depending on how it is used. I think those children that have behavior problems from watching too much TV falls back on the parents not monitoring what is watched and how long TV is watched. There are good shows that can teach children of all ages, young and old, things that are good and good for them. In our household TV is monitored by what is watched and how long it is watched. Work is to be done first (everyone has chores around the house that I expect to be done before play time) and homework is not allowed in front of the TV. If I feel things aren't done or the TV has been on too long, I shut it off and they have to read or find something to do. I think in todays world parents aren't monitoring what their children are doing. They need to be more active in their chil]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>1st period Future unit reaction</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (Cody Worthington)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>Cody Worthington edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction">1st period Future unit reaction</a></h3>
The body armor of today will pale in comparision with the super suit of tomarrow. The future may be uncertain but if this suit starts to be produced, wars of the future will be fought in a completly different manner. I'll start by describing the helmet. This is where the brains of the system is which is described as &quot;the sitituational awareness hub of the system.&quot; With its intergrated tactical processing, which is things such as maps and fastest routes, 180 degrees of view allow with the protective visor,and its super fast processor which processes information at one GB per second is mainly of communication. It also provies combat sensors for 360 degrees awareness and provides small arms protection to the head in limited areas. The entire suit will be powered by liquid hydrocarbon, which can power the entire suit for six days, and a back-up battery that can power the suit for a total of three hours. If you are interested in this and wish to find out more please vist &amp;lt;http://nsc.natick.army.mi]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>6th period Future Unit</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (Alex)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>Alex edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit">6th period Future Unit</a></h3>
Work Cited<br />“Doctors Urge Families to Participate in TV-Turnoff Week.” New York Amsterdam News. 19 April 2007. 4 October 2007 EBSCOhost &amp;lt;<br /><span style="font-weight:bold;color:green;background-color:#cfc;">Reaction to “Techno Troubles”<br />In today’s society, children focus their attention on the latest technology available. Just look around. On any given day you can see high school, junior high, and even elementary children using their cell phones, I-pods or game boys. Instead of them asking, “Who wants to play some hoops?” you hear them saying, “Who do you want to text?” part of the problem is the example set by parents. Adults are so busy and pre-occupied by their own lives that it is just easier to say, go watch a movie or go play your video game.” Let’s face it; most kids can’t afford cell phones, I-pods or any other technical toy. Even if they could, it is the parent’s responsibility to make limitations. What happened to the words “go outside and play.”? 0parents need to set the example and lead the kids to a healthy life st</span>]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>1st period Future unit reaction</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (Nick Lamb)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>Nick Lamb edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction">1st period Future unit reaction</a></h3>
Television is a bad influence in the United States, as well as in other countries. Though television can be an informative source, such as the daily news, for important events and other things that would help the average person no matter the age. The unfortunate thing is that television also offers the shows that are very bad influences for everyone; and these are the programs that are being watched by most. Even the daily news, although very informative, focuses mainly on things that went bad or are going badly. The television is not only making everyone's life a little less active, but it is putting ideas into the heads of people that those things are alright, that everyone is doing this or that, and worst of all teaching younger children things that they shouldn't know until their adolesence or until they're a young adult. This story was a tradgedy waiting to happen, and unfortunately it did. I hope this sends a lesson out to parents and others that TV can be a very destructive thing. &amp;lt;http://www.ha]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>1st period Future unit reaction</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (Travis Zachrich)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>Travis Zachrich edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction">1st period Future unit reaction</a></h3>
Technology has been taking over quicker than it should be able to. Many people in the world today focus on their computer, televisions, cell phones and ipods more than they do their own education or their own job. Because we already have so many things of technology, companies feel the need that they have to make more to satisfy customers. Many people do their work over the internet and check their work email at home. Some people even have numerous email accounts for seperate things like online shopping. A poll was taken and four out of every ten americans feel that they need thier high speed internet with their daily lives and two out of ten said the same thing for their DVD players and such. Nearly HALF of the people said that they simply just could not live without internet access. Humanity these days rely on their internet or high tech things daily but they do not need to. With all this technology it is so easy to have identity theft, viruses, spam and even fraud but most people do not pay attention becau]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>1st period Future unit reaction</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (Travis Zachrich)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>Travis Zachrich edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/1st+period+Future+unit+reaction">1st period Future unit reaction</a></h3>
Technology has been taking over quicker than it should be able to. Many people in the world today focus on their computer, televisions, cell phones and ipods more than they do their own education or their own job. Because we already have so many things of technology, companies feel the need that they have to make more to satisfy customers. Many people do their work over the internet and check their work email at home. Some people even have numerous email accounts for seperate things like online shopping. A poll was taken and four out of every ten americans feel that they need thier high speed internet with their daily lives and two out of ten said the same thing for their DVD players and such. Nearly HALF of the people said that they simply just could not live without internet access. Humanity these days rely on their internet or high tech things daily but they do not need to. With all this technology it is so easy to have identity theft, viruses, spam and even fraud but most people do not pay attention becau]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>6th period Future Unit</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (Lauren Hammersmith)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>Lauren Hammersmith edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit">6th period Future Unit</a></h3>
<span style="color:red;background-color:#fcc;">Reaction to Lauren Mengerink and Trang Nguyen’s blog regarding North Korea’s decision to do a Nuclear Test<br />The decision of North Korea to test a nuclear bomb could definitely disrupt good diplomatic relations with the United States and its Allies. Since the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki took several hundreds of lives to end World War II, it has been felt by many that the use of nuclear force could have catastrophic effects in the preservation of our world as we currently know it. Since WWII, the US and other nations have tried by other means to diplomatically resolve their issues and keep balance in the world power. It has been difficult to keep this balance at times (i.e. Cold War between U.S. and Russia), but techniques such as economic sanctions have definitely been successful at times and are worth considering. In conclusion, it is felt that the United States negotiations with China in influencing their decision to pose economic sanctions may be one way of keeping North Korea not to continue</span>]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>6th period Future Unit</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (Lauren Hammersmith)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>Lauren Hammersmith edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit">6th period Future Unit</a></h3>
<span style="font-weight:bold;color:green;background-color:#cfc;">Reaction to Lauren Mengerink and Trang Nguyen’s blog regarding North Korea’s decision to do a Nuclear Test<br />The decision of North Korea to test a nuclear bomb could definitely disrupt good diplomatic relations with the United States and its Allies. Since the bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki took several hundreds of lives to end World War II, it has been felt by many that the use of nuclear force could have catastrophic effects in the preservation of our world as we currently know it. Since WWII, the US and other nations have tried by other means to diplomatically resolve their issues and keep balance in the world power. It has been difficult to keep this balance at times (i.e. Cold War between U.S. and Russia), but techniques such as economic sanctions have definitely been successful at times and are worth considering. In conclusion, it is felt that the United States negotiations with China in influencing their decision to pose economic sanctions may be one way of keeping North Korea not to continue</span>]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
 <item>
  <title>6th period Future Unit</title>
  <link>http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit</link>
  <author>email.hidden@example.com (Candace McCullough)</author>
  <description><![CDATA[<h3>Candace McCullough edited <a href="http://thefedpageblog.pbwiki.com/6th+period+Future+Unit">6th period Future Unit</a></h3>
J.J. Erickson Dillon Flint<br />Smart Houses<br /><span style="color:red;background-color:#fcc;">Candace</span><span style="font-weight:bold;color:green;background-color:#cfc;">Candace</span><span style="font-weight:bold;color:green;background-color:#cfc;"> McCullough</span><br />Kelley Schroeder<br />Houses are becoming more advanced everyday, but it isn’t an overnight project. New advancements will be hard to make because they are extremely expensive and people’s preferences are different. Smart houses that will be built in the future will be able to grow with the family. These changes won’t be dramatic because it takes generations to transform the ideas of the general public, but people should keep in mind that “10 years ago we didn’t have the internet” so anything is possible (Dunlevy 2).<br />]]></description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
  <category>mod</category>
 </item>
</channel>
</rss>
